{"id":2353,"date":"2014-08-10T07:59:12","date_gmt":"2014-08-10T11:59:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=2353"},"modified":"2014-08-10T08:02:30","modified_gmt":"2014-08-10T12:02:30","slug":"creativity-is-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=2353","title":{"rendered":"Creativity is UP!"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_2356\" style=\"width: 332px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/512px_thumbnail_converted.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2356\" class=\" wp-image-2356\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/512px_thumbnail_converted.jpg?resize=322%2C198\" alt=\"Up, Navy Pilot\" width=\"322\" height=\"198\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/512px_thumbnail_converted.jpg?w=512&amp;ssl=1 512w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/512px_thumbnail_converted.jpg?resize=300%2C184&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/512px_thumbnail_converted.jpg?resize=487%2C300&amp;ssl=1 487w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 322px) 100vw, 322px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2356\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(photo: wikimedia.org)<\/p><\/div>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Metaphors-We-Live-George-Lakoff\/dp\/0226468011\">Metaphors We Live By<\/a><\/em> (George Lakoff and Mark Johnson) is a classic study of the way metaphor shapes our understanding of the world. Published in 1980, it dismisses the idea that metaphors are strictly a matter of language, the frosting on the cake of meaning, as argued by various competing philosophical and linguistic traditions. In what I usually read, the search for truth is conducted not by academics, but by a fictional detective, so some of this was heavy going. Where the authors dig into the language, their examples are fascinating.<\/p>\n<p>Lakoff and Johnson are not generally talking about literary metaphors, but rather about the ones so thoroughly absorbed into the language that we no longer notice them as metaphors. One fundamental set of such metaphors reflects \u201corientation\u201d: up-down, in-out, back-front, and so on. Although some metaphors in this set appear to be more or less universal across languages, others are more culturally determined. In Western culture, many common phrases reflect the metaphor \u201chappy is <em>up<\/em>\u201d and its opposite, \u201csad is <em>down<\/em>.\u201d Examples are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>That <em>boosted<\/em> my spirits.<\/li>\n<li>I\u2019m <em>depressed<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>It gave him a <em>lift<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>My heart <em>sank<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>Being <em>up-beat<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Extending this pattern, health and life are <em>up<\/em>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It\u2019s time to get <em>up<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li>He\u2019s at the <em>pinnacle<\/em> of health.<\/li>\n<li>Lazarus <em>rose<\/em> from the dead.<\/li>\n<li>She <em>sank<\/em> into a coma.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>More is <em>up<\/em> (this one, we even represent graphically):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>My income <em>rose<\/em> last year.<\/li>\n<li>The Dow reached a new <em>high<\/em>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Having control is <em>up<\/em>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>He\u2019s at the <em>height<\/em> of his powers.<\/li>\n<li>She has control <em>over<\/em> the situation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>And so on. This metaphor is so pervasive, we don\u2019t notice it. The other orientation pairs are embedded in the language in much the same way, and from the various concepts they signify, they form a coherent way of understanding our world.<\/p>\n<p>Lakoff and Johnson also discuss how we depend on metaphor to help us structure inherently vague concepts, like emotions, in terms of more concrete things we may have directly experienced. Complex emotions, like love or anger, have inspired many overlapping (and sometimes conflicting) metaphors. For example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Love (vague) is a journey (concrete).<\/li>\n<li>Anger (vague) is hot (concrete).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The \u201clove is a journey\u201d metaphor underlies statements like: \u201cWe\u2019re on the road to romance\u201d (think Sinatra\u2019s: \u201cNice \u2018n\u2019 Easy\u201d); \u201cIt\u2019s a rocky road to love.\u201d; \u201cWe went in different directions.\u201d; or \u201cThis relationship isn\u2019t going anywhere.\u201d The \u201canger is hot\u201d metaphor leads to: \u201cI was boiling mad\u201d; \u201cCool it!\u201d; and \u201cin the heat of the moment.\u201d (Icy cold anger is scary perhaps because it\u2019s so counterintuitive.)<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m trying to understand all this (which is the tip of the tip of the iceberg, you understand) in terms of writing. \u201cWe draw inferences, set goals, make commitments, and execute plans, all on the basis of how we in part structure our experience, consciously and unconsciously, by means of metaphor,\u201d say Lakoff and Johnson. The orientation metaphors and their many variants perhaps explain why, a writer\u2019s attempts to create a literary metaphor sometimes miss the mark. Perhaps they have violated this coherent, and implicit language system.<\/p>\n<p>A linguistic exploration of the metaphors underlying emotion seems to me like an endorsement of the frequent dictum: \u201cshow, don\u2019t tell.\u201d Simply saying that a fictional character feels love or anger or happiness conveys little to the reader, because readers will have different ways\u2014and many competing ways\u2014of interpreting that emotion, depending on the metaphors through which they see the world. The metaphors underlying those feelings must be expressed\u2014and in some fresh way that is consistent with the existing substrate (safer) or totally new, stretching both writer and reader.<\/p>\n<p>Read more at: <a href=\"http:\/\/theliterarylink.com\/metaphors.html\">The Literary Link<\/a> and, for some juicy literary metaphors, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drmardy.com\/metaphor\/welcome.shtml\">Welcome to the World of Metaphor<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h6 class=\"zemanta-related-title\" style=\"font-size: 1em;\">Related articles<\/h6>\n<ul class=\"zemanta-article-ul zemanta-article-ul-image\" style=\"margin: 0; padding: 0; overflow: hidden;\">\n<li class=\"zemanta-article-ul-li-image zemanta-article-ul-li\" style=\"padding: 0; background: none; list-style: none; display: block; float: left; vertical-align: top; text-align: left; width: 84px; font-size: 11px; margin: 2px 10px 10px 2px;\"><a style=\"box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px #999; padding: 2px; display: block; border-radius: 2px; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.3ammagazine.com\/3am\/metaphors-mind-fiction-and-baboons\/\" target=\"_blank\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"padding: 0; margin: 0; border: 0; display: block; width: 80px; max-width: 100%;\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i.zemanta.com\/243972362_80_80.jpg?w=584\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><a style=\"display: block; overflow: hidden; text-decoration: none; line-height: 12pt; height: 83px; padding: 5px 2px 0 2px; background-image: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.3ammagazine.com\/3am\/metaphors-mind-fiction-and-baboons\/\" target=\"_blank\">metaphors and minds<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Metaphors We Live By (George Lakoff and Mark Johnson) is a classic study of the way metaphor shapes our understanding of the world. Published in 1980, it dismisses the idea that metaphors are strictly a matter of language, the frosting &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=2353\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[74,174,185,51,29],"tags":[414],"class_list":["post-2353","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-emotions","category-first-draft-blog","category-language","category-words","category-writing","tag-writing"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2NkiT-BX","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2353","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2353"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2353\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2358,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2353\/revisions\/2358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2353"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2353"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2353"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}