{"id":5743,"date":"2016-06-09T08:19:28","date_gmt":"2016-06-09T12:19:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=5743"},"modified":"2016-06-11T15:37:39","modified_gmt":"2016-06-11T19:37:39","slug":"jane-austens-dark-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=5743","title":{"rendered":"Jane Austen’s Dark Side"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"birdcages\"

photo: Kirk Maddison, creative commons license<\/p><\/div>\n

Mikita Brottman<\/a> recently wrote in The American Scholar <\/em>about the virtues of going deeply into a narrow subject, such as Jane Austen did in her fictional world. How often do we feel that in the sweep of novels that cover centuries and generations we have lost the particular that made the years and the individuals vivid and unique? How much more can be revealed by Austen and her magnifying glass for social mores? Stuff that\u2019s not so pretty, Brottman thinks.<\/p>\n

Austen is a popular fan fiction subject, with 1,266 entries, pastiches, and spinoffs on the Archive of Our Own<\/a> fanfic website. The author, dead almost 200 years, is on coffee mugs, and board books, coloring books, air fresheners, iPhone covers, and teapot cookies. (This may be the place to recall that when I showed up at the local post office wearing my \u201cI \u2665 Mr. Darcy\u201d t-shirt, the clerk said, \u201cOh, that must be your husband!\u201d \u201cNo, Pride and Prejudice.\u201d \u201cIs that a tv show?\u201d) All these commercial incarnations underscore the bright, romantic view of Janeworld.<\/p>\n

What was Jane really saying?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Brottman\u2019s favorite novel Austen novel these days is Mansfield Park<\/em>, with its self-effacing heroine, Fanny Price. MP<\/em> has long been thought Austen\u2019s \u201cproblem novel\u201d and \u201cdifficult\u201d (interesting critique<\/a> from another fan here). Over time, the other, better-known novels have become less romantic for Brottman because their heroines\u2019 world was so small\u2014an accurate portrayal for the times. Austen herself likened her writing to “painting with a ‘fine brush’ on ‘a little bit\u2014two inches\u2014of ivory.’\u201d I’ll be interested to see what Whit Stillman does with Austen in his recently released movie, Love and Friendship<\/em>.<\/p>\n

While we may remember with deep nostalgia the innocence of our adolescent ideas about love and destiny, our visions of a rich and handsome partner, and our longing to move in a refined, elegant world (\u201csomeday, my prince will come\u201d), maybe it\u2019s \u201ctime to give up on childhood fantasies,\u201d says the fanfic author heleanna, who writes as The Butterfly Dreamer<\/a> and has her own take on overcoming Mansfield Park<\/em>\u2019s constraints.<\/p>\n

Below the surface of balls and calling cards, Austen is not romantic at all, Brottman believes, but rather \u201ca very dark writer.\u201d Under the taffeta and lace, \u201cthese well-bred young women are trapped like rats,\u201d prisoners of rigid social rules and expectations. As some 150 years later poet Maya Angelou wrote about a different set of social constraints, \u201cI know why the caged bird sings.\u201d<\/p>\n

(Brottman<\/a> is a prolific author and cultural commentator. I\u2019d like to read her brand new book The Maximum Security Book Club: Reading Literature in a Men\u2019s Prison<\/em>, published June 7.)
\n