{"id":6390,"date":"2017-02-21T12:08:32","date_gmt":"2017-02-21T17:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=6390"},"modified":"2017-02-22T08:16:06","modified_gmt":"2017-02-22T13:16:06","slug":"why-crimethrillermysteries-fall-short","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=6390","title":{"rendered":"Why Crime\/Thriller\/Mystery Novels Fall Short"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_6141\" style=\"width: 264px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-6141\" class=\" wp-image-6141\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/10\/Reading.jpg?resize=254%2C225\" alt=\"reading, book\" width=\"254\" height=\"225\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-6141\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">photo: Kamil Porembi\u0144ski, creative commons license<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Over the past 21 months, I\u2019ve read and reviewed 62 crime novels and thrillers for crimefictionlover.com. While a number of them rise to greatness and many effectively get the job done, a surprising number were not ready for prime time, and a tiny number should have gone straight to the landfill. Many works fall short because author s believe their book is \u201cdone,\u201d and it isn\u2019t. Too often, I find myself saying, \u201cDamn!\u2014With a little more effort, this could have been soooo good.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As a writer myself, I take into consideration the author\u2019s hopes and effort, knowing it\u2019s hard to see the flaws in one\u2019s own children. That\u2019s what editors are for. Yet, the acknowledgements pages of poor books often heap extravagant praise on their editors, whom I envision curled up under their desks, weeping. Authorial intentions aside, my primary obligation is to potential readers. Will readers\u2019 limited reading time be well invested if they pick up this particular book?<\/p>\n<p>The common problems in crime\/thriller books I\u2019ve read recently fit into two overlapping categories: pitfalls in <em>thinking<\/em> (mostly related to plot and character), listed below, and <a href=\"http:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=6392\">pitfalls in <\/a><em>writing. <\/em>Thinking and writing problems are mutually reinforcing, since poor writing makes poor thinking more obvious. For those who respond to examples, I\u2019ve included a few from \u201cactual books.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Thinking Pitfalls<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Using increasingly gruesome torture and death methods (or a surfeit of comely young women\/child victims) in the hope of sustaining reader interest. Bloodletting is easy; creating complex, unique, and engaging characters with grounded, understandable motivations is hard.<\/li>\n<li>Mechanical problems\u2014Where and when did stuff happen? Chris Roerden calls lack of clarity about the story timeline \u201ccrazy time,\u201d and it drives readers crazy.<\/li>\n<li>Galloping unreality\u2014Example: after a big-city police chief spoke at a news conference, \u201cseveral reporters broke into a round of applause.\u201d <em>Not any journalists I know.<\/em> Another: two undercover CIA agents are scouting a computer research lab on a busy Chinese university campus. \u201c\u2018That\u2019s the building the lab\u2019s in,\u2019 XX said, pointing.\u201d <em>Pointing<\/em>? And I don\u2019t know how many times a bad guy has used a chloroform-soaked cloth to disable a victim, when a single moment of fact-checking would reveal this doesn\u2019t work!<\/li>\n<li>Technological non-fixes\u2014Either using technology when it\u2019s not needed just to sound cool, using it wrong (weapons, especially), or not using it at all&#8211;say, not picking up the phone to ask a simple question that would solve everything.<\/li>\n<li>Lack of engagement\u2014Some authors just want to sell books, often choosing the method describe in the first bullet, not provide the reader with a deeper, emotionally engaging experience. Crime\/thrillers often appeal to the head, but the best ones capture the heart too. \u201cWhen a plot resolves, readers are satisfied, but what they remember of a novel is what they felt while reading it,\u201d says Donald Maass.<\/li>\n<li>Cheesy theorizing\u2014When characters come up with premature but enthusiastically adopted explanations of what happened or whodunnit, readers know they are being misled.<\/li>\n<li>Failure to answer all the plot questions\u2014Did the author just forget a main character\u2019s spouse mysteriously committed suicide? Did he forget the police psychologist dropped the case\u2019s murder book on a city street? For that matter, why was he carrying it out of the office anyway? Big questions need answers.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>Further Reading for Authors<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2l402Gw\"><em>Don\u2019t Murder Your Mystery<\/em><\/a> by Chris Roerden \u2013 packed with commonsense tips<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2mifD5p\"><em>The Writer\u2019s Guide to Weapons<\/em><\/a> by Benjamin Sobieck \u2013 including impossible scenarios<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/2lCHekQ\"><em>The Emotional Craft of Fiction<\/em><\/a> by Donald Maass\u2014inspiration for digging deeper<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the past 21 months, I\u2019ve read and reviewed 62 crime novels and thrillers for crimefictionlover.com. While a number of them rise to greatness and many effectively get the job done, a surprising number were not ready for prime time, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=6390\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":true,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[174,29],"tags":[845,846,771,89],"class_list":["post-6390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-draft-blog","category-writing","tag-benjamin-sobieck","tag-chris-roerden","tag-donald-maass","tag-reading"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2NkiT-1F4","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6390"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6395,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6390\/revisions\/6395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}