{"id":8864,"date":"2021-02-25T07:43:46","date_gmt":"2021-02-25T12:43:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=8864"},"modified":"2021-07-08T11:32:47","modified_gmt":"2021-07-08T15:32:47","slug":"what-you-wear-is-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=8864","title":{"rendered":"What You Wear Is Code"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft size-large is-resized\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/vweisfeld.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Trunk-Hose.jpg?resize=284%2C550&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8865\" width=\"284\" height=\"550\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Richard Thompson Ford\u2019s new book <em><a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3uw0nGe\">Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History<\/a><\/em> was the subject of a recent American Ancestors Zoom presentation, the day the book was reviewed in the <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em>. Ford is a Stanford Law professor who got interested in how dress codes (what you wear, your hairstyle) have affected employment opportunities. Plus he admits to being a bit of a clothes-horse himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Legal opinion on dress codes&#8217; effect on employment may treat them as if they are trivial. If so, the courts may be missing a lot of what\u2019s important about the issue. What people wear is part of their self-presentation and sense of dignity. Back in Europe\u2019s late middle ages, the puffy pantaloons called Trunk Hose (pictured) became the fashion for men. The upper classes resented their inferiors wearing the style and passed \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mentalfloss.com\/article\/94521\/6-times-sumptuary-laws-told-people-what-wear\">sumptuary laws<\/a>\u201d prohibiting extravagant fabrics and attire except for those of high rank\u2014a pure power play. No surprise, then, that in 1700s America, Blacks were prohibited from \u201cdressing above their station.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ford noted that Queen Elizabeth I understood the power of fashion\u2014magnificent, otherworldly fashion\u2014to set her apart. Over time, the type of attire that signified the wearer\u2019s importance changed, at least for men. Men&#8217;s attire became more sober and conservative. Think of the black-clad Dutch Masters. The culmination of this trend was the familiar business suit we know today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Intended also to convey the message that men were all equal, of course, little signals continue today to let people recognize the high-value \u201cbespoke\u201d suit versus one from Target.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You may remember the photos from the early Civil Rights movement with Martin Luther King and his colleagues marching and dressed in suits. They dressed in their \u201cSunday best\u201d to underscore the validity and seriousness of their quest. A few years later, younger activists wanted to express solidarity with the poor people they hoped to organize, so they dressed in jeans and overalls. The Black Panthers had their own dress code: black trousers, leather jackets, and berets. These were all deliberate decisions related to identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Until the 20<sup>th<\/sup> century, women wore draped clothing below the waist. Wearing pants was totally unacceptable. A 1903 article called women who insisted on wearing trousers \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/dangerousminds.net\/comments\/bifurcated_girls_surprisingly_smutty_sapphic_fashion_spread\">bifurcated<\/a>\u201d and clearly suggests they were a threat to the social order. As expressed in an essay for the Metropolitan Museum\u2019s wonderful exhibit: <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.metmuseum.org\/exhibitions\/listings\/2015\/china-through-the-looking-glass\">China Through the Looking Glass<\/a><\/em>, \u201cFashion is the means by which we convey identity and belonging (including nonbelonging),\u201d as in the case of the trouser-wearing women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By repressing the individuality of the wearer, requiring a certain type of dress can be a tool of degradation or control. The stricter the requirements, the more control exerted. Now, with casual Fridays all week long, new unarticulated \u201cdress codes\u201d still determine what people wear. It will be interesting to see how the extreme informality of working from home and never changing out of our pajamas may persist!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard Thompson Ford\u2019s new book Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History was the subject of a recent American Ancestors Zoom presentation, the day the book was reviewed in the Wall Street Journal. Ford is a Stanford Law &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/?p=8864\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"What You Wear Is Code - Forget Lady Gaga's Dress of Meats. The next frontier is when Dress Codes meet pajama-clad Zoomers!","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[122,1288,266,267,268,104],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book","category-culture","category-history","category-non-fiction","category-politics","category-the-morgue"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2NkiT-2iY","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8864"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9104,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8864\/revisions\/9104"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vweisfeld.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}