Why I Write Crime Fiction

The best thing about writing crime fiction (mysteries and thrillers) is the endless font of ideas. Thieves are at work (the Louvre!), scams are abundant, surveillance is creepy, shenanigans run rampant. The damage people can do to each other and themselves seems endless. Writing my new destination thriller She Knew Too Much, I was able to take advantage of a number of societal aberrations: murder, theft, scamming of a high order, kidnapping, fake identity, weaknesses in the law enforcement establishment, and more. It takes place in Rome, which means the mafia can be part of the picture, along with Italy’s Byzantine law enforcement structure.

One of the greatest advantages an author has in putting together a mystery/thriller is that these stories typically deal with people who are at one of the most consequential times of their lives. There’s emotional intensity, fear and frustration. Risk. Drama. People are not necessarily at their best—or maybe they are. They learn things about their community, friends, family, partners, and themselves which sometimes they’d rather not know. It’s a time in their lives when what they do really matters. An important challenge for writers is to make the stakes matter to readers too.

A lot of writers play it safe and rely on worn-out plotlines. I read and review about 50 new crime/mystery/thriller books a year, and many of them still rely on genre clichés. Writers need to come up with something fresher than serial killers, gaslighting spouses, reunions of old friends where the secrets finally come out, and morally weary detectives with a divorce and a drinking problem. The ease with which an author can get sucked into those overdone plots is one of the cons.

Mystery stories are very popular (pro), so writers have to get their facts right—weapons, police procedure, geography and so on—which takes research (a con for some authors). Factual errors make a story lose credibility. At the same time, the author isn’t writing a textbook. No reader enjoys a big indigestible information dump. (The worst example I can think of was an author’s description of a weapon in which he used actual bullet points—not the shooting kind, the PowerPoint kind.) Recognizing the truly necessary details and artfully weaving them into the story is another of the writer’s challenges.

The need for research isn’t a con for me. Research is part of my process, and it always gives me ideas I would never have otherwise. In She Knew Too Much, I identified a small suburban town north of Rome where a gang member could hide. I found out (map research and street camera) that the town I’d chosen has a farmer’s market on Saturdays. Having the gang member visit that market, in full view of the street camera, became part of the story.

Another pro-might-be-con is the ubiquity of cell phones, street cameras (in some places), and information technology. Some stories or TV mysteries could be solved and trouble avoided if characters would just make a phone call. Perhaps this explains the popularity of setting stories a few decades—even centuries—ago. It avoids the technology complication but opens up significant new research challenges. Genie Clarke, the main character in She Knew Too Much, has to go completely off social media to keep the gangsters from tracking her. As a travel blogger with an active online presence, she feels even more disconnected from her usual world.

That’s her environment, and that’s part of the story. You can order it here from:
Bookshop.org
Barnes & Noble
Amazon

Meet Amit Madoor . . .

When reading my new novel She Knew Too Much for the umpteenth time–not as a Word document this time, but as a “real book” for proofreading–I was struck again by how much I liked not just the main characters, but also the secondary ones.

One of my favorites has always been Amit Madoor, the mafia’s Moroccan fence. He has a way of getting top dollar for stolen goods, and I was so fascinated by how his career might have started, I wrote far too much! I took out the passages not essential to the novel and turned them into a standalone short story, with its own arc and resolution, which takes place almost thirty years before the novel.

It involves a case that has always fascinated me–the still (in real life) unsolved robbery of Boston’s Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. The precious artworks stolen constitute the largest property theft in history, and they have never been recovered. Experts say that stealing artworks is child’s play next to trying to dispose of them afterward. That’s where Madoor excels.

In my short story, “Above Suspicion,” published in Sherlock Holmes Mystery Magazine, I hewed carefully to the exact details of the crime. Of course, I invented the thieves, but I think my theory about who they might have been and why they’ve never been caught holds up. You can read it here!

Meanwhile, to learn about Amit Madoor’s vital role in the plot threatening American travel writer Genie Clarke, read She Knew Too Much, available from Bookshop.org, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and other notable booksellers. The novel takes place in Rome, where Madoor now lives, and involves a handsome Italian police detective and a whole cast of intriguing characters.

Mistakes, I’ve Made a Few

Architect of Courage accompanied me to the Princeton Public Library’s Local Author Day. I sat with friend and awesome fellow thriller-author Kevin G. Chapman, and the crowd was impressive. The library’s community room included dozens of authors, a number of whom publish children’s book, who decorated their tables with stuffed animals, princess crowns, and the like. One of Kevin’s book covers includes a knife-blade dripping with blood. And his titles include words like Assassin, Dead, and Fatal. We passed on having an appropriately themed display for our table.

Another local author visited with us and spent an excruciatingly long time at our table after telling us he doesn’t buy books. Instead, he re-reads favorites from decades ago. He then had a long—very long—rap about how, unlike Kevin’s Assassin, Dead, and Fatal covers, his bloody knives and corpses, the cover of Architect of Courage doesn’t signal “thriller.” I’d heard that before, but filed it in the category of “can’t do anything about it, so why worry?”

Kevin laughed when the next person to stop at our table said, “Oooh, I love that cover!” But she didn’t realize the book is a thriller. Of course. So, too late to reprint, I did finally take these comments to heart and ordered see-through labels that read “International Crime Thriller” to affix underneath the title of the copies I have, and I created a graphic that does the same. I’ve replaced the book cover photo on my website and used the new one in an ad I’m running this summer. So, that long diatribe we suffered through was actually helpful! Big smile.

Now I’m all set for The Flemington Summer Book Fest May 28, the Burlington County Book Festival June 3, along with pals from the Central NJ Chapter of Sisters in Crime, The Passaic County Book Festival June 10, and, later this summer, the Public Safety Writers Association annual conference! Hope to see you there!

Where Story Ideas Come From: Why Courage?

I didn’t set out to write a book about courage. In fact I was probably on a second or third draft, pestering myself with questions like, “what am I really trying to say?” “why might readers find this book not just entertaining but meaningful?” “do I find it meaningful and why?” i’m not a writer who can dash off several books a year; I have to think about them a while. And thinking about these questions, I finally realized I was missing an easy opportunity to express what it is about, without having to pen a preachy narration.

In the opening pages of my new book, Architect of Courage, Manhattan architect Archer Landis discovers his lover has been murdered. He’s afraid of the fallout if he’s caught in her apartment, and without considering the implications, he delays calling the police. Instead, he hastily returns to the business dinner he’d left not long before, determined to make the call from there. Alas, circumstances prevent it. What had he been thinking?

The dinner is to celebrate the important award one of his best friends is receiving and now he has to sit through it. The friend, Phil Prinz, takes this speaking opportunity to talk about courage. Now, we’ve all been to dinners where the speaker rambles on about some high-flown topic, and we’ve occasionally been pleasantly surprised to hear some nuggets worth remembering. Phil chose a worthy topic, but he’s no orator.

Still he breaks the topic down in an elegant way, describing four kinds of courage (briefly in the novel): physical courage, you know what that is; mental courage, when people dare to think in new ways; emotional courage, when they put their feelings on the line; and moral courage, when they do the right thing simply because it’s right. Landis doesn’t spend a lot of time then or later reflecting on Phil’s remarks—he’s too upset about what happened earlier in the evening. But I hope I’ve planted a seed for readers so they recognize that, despite his early failure, Landis displays all of four types of courage before the story ends. But if all you’re looking for is a lively adventure, there’s that too.

Available from Amazon on preorder!