Hollywood Directors’ WWII Mission

Leni Riefenstahl, Nazi Party

1934 Nazi Party Congress, Nuremberg (photo: wikimedia.org)

The wartime experiences of five major film directors are recounted in the Mark Harris book, Five Came Back: A Story of Hollywood and the Second World War, which has garnered impressive reviews. The book describes the military contributions of five directors near the top of their careers: Frank Capra, John Ford, William Wyler, George Stevens, and John Huston. David Denby gives a nice summary of Harris’s book in the March 17 New Yorker.

(The pre-war activities of Tinseltown’s studios were pretty bad, according to two widely discussed books last year. The studios held back on films attacking fascism or condemning persecution of the Jews, in order to continue doing business in Germany, according to Ben Urwand in The Collaboration. As a result, “Nazis were all but invisible in American movies at the time when depicting their savagery might have done the most good,” said Dave Kehr in a NYT review of  Thomas Doherty’s Hollywood and Hitler, 1933-1939.)

Capra was put in charge of Why We Fight, a series of training films for U.S. recruits, at the request of Gen. George C. Marshall. Capra saw this assignment as a democratic response to Leni Riefenstahl’s inspiring propaganda film, Triumph of the Will, depicting the 1934 Nazi party congress and the aims and ideals of the Third Reich.

The five directors approached their assignments differently, but in every case with impressive results. George Stevens’s documentary approach to recording the post-war liberation of Dachau became two films used at the first Nuremberg Trial.

What the directors produced upon their return home was irrevocably colored and deepened by these experiences, including Ford’s They Were Expendable, as Denby says, “a film suffused with an elegiac melancholy that is unique in American movies”; William Wyler’s The Best Years of our Lives; and Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life, in its way, the answer to Marshall’s challenge: a vision of a way of life “for which Americans would have gone to war,” says Denby.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Finding Vivian Maier

Vivian Maier, street photography, Rolleiflex, camera

(photo: wikimedia.org)

Another Netflix possibility, if it’s not playing in your local theater, Finding Vivian Maier, (trailer) is the story of the prolific photo-documentarian whose work came within a hair’s breadth of being lost forever.

According to a Wired story by Doug Bierend, the dedication of the filmmaker, John Maloof, in bringing her story to the public is a tale of equal parts dogged detection and appreciation of the joys of street photography.

A five-star rating from Rotten Tomatoes: 97% of critics liked it! If it’s as good as the documentary of legendary street fashion photographer Bill Cunningham, it will be a gem!

Many of Maier’s works can be seen on the Artsy website’s Vivian Maier page.

UPDATE 10-22-14: Good rundown of the increasingly complex copyright claims and counterclaims swirling around Maier’s work in this Jillian Steinhauer article. I wonder how many of the men now vying for rights to her work would have given a nanny with the photography bug the time of day when she was alive?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Suzanne

Sara Forestier, Adele Haenel, Suzanne, film

Sara Forestier and Adele Haenel in Suzanne (France, 2013) (photo:i2.wp.com)

For your Netflix list – Suzanne (trailer), a 2013 French film directed by Katell Quillévéré (review here). Shown at the Trenton International Film Festival last weekend, Suzanne is an unsentimental character study of a young woman who makes all the wrong choices. The performances by all four main characters, and the young actors who play Suzanne’s son at different ages are all remarkable. The award-winning actors Sara Forestier and Adèle Haenel play the title character and her sister Maria. “And you know that she’s half crazy, but that’s why you want to be there.”  Rotten Tomatoes rating: 90%.

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Lunch Box

Irrfan Khan in The Lunch Box (photo: artsatl.com)

Irrfan Khan in The Lunch Box (photo: artsatl.com)

Like an April Fool’s joke, only one in a million Mumbai lunch boxes goes astray, and yet, the unexpected happens . . . Much to like in the new Indian movie, The Lunch Box, (trailer) and I guarantee that if you like Indian food at all, you’ll be ready to go out to dinner afterwards! There’s a clever premise, depending on the accuracy of the Mumbai dabba wallahs to deliver thousands of home-cooked lunches to office workers, on time and still hot.

When a lonely widower receives an unusually delicious meal, a correspondence ensues, that thaws his heart and steels the young woman for what she must do. Truthfully, it dragged somewhat about two-thirds through, but picked up again. Fascinating glimpses into culture and daily life, too. Nice performances by the three leads: familiar actor Irrfan Khan, Nimrat Kaur, and Nawazuddin Siddiqui. Rotten Tomatoes ratings: 95% (critics) and 87% (audiences).

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Oscar Winner: The Great Beauty

The Great Beauty, Toni Servillo, Paolo SorrentinoWanted to see The Great Beauty (trailer), the Paolo Sorrentino’s movie that won this year’s Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. And could have won for cinematography—in it, Rome is The Great Beauty. Nice score, too. Toni Servillo makes the essentially selfish main character actually charming.

It’s the story of Jep Gambardella, who won fame with one novelette many years before and survives as merely a social creature, someone who knows everyone and whom everyone knows. The send-ups of performance art—and artists—are genuinely funny. But most of the film is linked together only by being in some way over-the-top, with the only authentic exchanges ones Jep has with his maid. You keep waiting for Jep to wake up, because scenes’ link to reality seems so tenuous. The botox clinic, the man with the keys, the giraffe.

The disconnected scenes—from the profane to the sublime—just didn’t add up to much for me. Roger Ebert liked it better than I did. Rotten Tomatoes rating: critics (91%); audience (79%).

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Grand Budapest Hotel

Edward Norton, Ralph Fiennes, Tony Revolori, The Grand Budapest Hotel

The Grand Budapest Hotel (trailer and other stuff here)—sold out in the local movie house playing it on two screeens—is an enjoyable romp through the Central European country of Zubrowka, obscure even by fictional standards in the early 1930’s, as an unnamed brutal regime is taking increasing power. It’s best not to fixate on Wes Anderson’s tissue-paper plot and instead enjoy the numerous cameo roles. I have to believe that working on Anderson’s movies is fun; otherwise so many notable actors wouldn’t agree to do it!

Anderson didn’t break the budget on a lot of CGI to achieve verisimilitude—the imaginary vistas fit right into this fable about a generous spirit with impeccable standards. It’s great to see Ralph Fiennes, one of my faves, in an upbeat role for a change as the hotel’s concierge, Gustave H.  The fascist peril is real, nonetheless, and marks the certain end of the world the concierge is trying to desperately to protect.

If you need a break from late winter’s interminable gloom, this movie is a lively breath of spring. Rotten Tomatoes rating: critics and audiences agree (for once): 91%. Says critic Rene Rodriguez, “the pleasure curls your toes.”

The movie is based on the several writings by Austrian novelist, biographer, and playwright Stefan Zweig, a Jew who in real life fled his country upon the rise of Hitler—first to London, then New York, and Brazil.Enhanced by Zemanta

Enough Said

James Gandolfini, Julia Louis Dreyfus, Enough SaidSuch a shame James Gandolfini’s near-last movie had to be the lifeless Enough Said (trailer). The acting is fine, but the dialog is awful. And at the crisis moment, when he asks the heroine why she did what she did, the writer drew a blank, leaving poor Julia Louis Dreyfus to just shrug. So much for motivation. As reviewer Nathan Rabin said, “Enough Said is afflicted with a terminal case of what Roger Ebert dubbed ‘The Idiot Plot,’ in which a single reasonable sentence uttered in a rational tone could easily, diplomatically resolve the film’s core conflict.” Actually painful to watch.

As is so often the case with Hollywood, what these two see in each other is another blank—they laugh a lot, or she does—and she has to be a pretty dumb cluck not to question some of the received opinions about him. Her friends—Toni Collette and Ben Falcone—are a mysterious couple, who stay together because . . . actually, I can’t figure out why. Collette, it turns out, is a therapist, but displays no insight into her friend’s relationship or why she herself keeps rearranging her furniture. Same house, same furniture, same husband.

Rotten Tomatoes rating: an unbelievable 96, which I have to believe reflected the reviewers’ respect for Gandolfini in roles other than this one. Among audience members—generally more forgiving—only 78 percent liked it.

P.S. Maybe in Hollywood, they still call a woman “masseuse,” but everywhere else it’s “massage therapist.”

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Heartlands

Michael Sheen, Heartlands, movieThe British movie Heartlands (2002) (trailer) and I got off on the wrong foot when I glimpsed the opening credits and saw —–Sheen in the cast, and I waited apprehensively for Charlie Sheen to show up. Finally, I recognized a young Michael Sheen. Then the accents made sense, too. Sheen plays a terminally mild-mannered young man whose only discernible talent is playing darts. He throws them throughout the opening credits and, after I started noticing, he didn’t blink once.

In the film, he’s aced out of both a big darts tournament and his wife by none other than Jim Carter (Downton Abbey’s redoubtable Carson—fun to see him in his younger days). Our hero takes his mo-ped on the road to get to Blackpool (“the Las Vegas of the North”) and win her back. Road movies always turn into picaresques, and he meets some terrific characters on the way.

Not a must-see, but sweet. Sheen is always terrific. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 60 percent, but 81 percent of the audience liked it! Me, too. Low stress. (And not to be confused with other movies of similar names!)

Tim’s Vermeer

The Music Lesson, Johannes Vermeer, camera obscura, optics, Tim's Vermeer, Tim Jenison

Watching the meticulous recreation of Vermeer’s painting, “The Music Lesson,” by inventor Tim Jenison practically gave me hand-cramps. And the result? I urge you to watch this documentary (trailer) produced  by Penn Gillette, Tim’s friend, and see for yourself. The saga started when Tim read how optics technology—lenses and the camera obscura—may have been used in producing some of the great works of 17th century art.

As an inventor, not an artist, Tim attempts to replicate such a method and comes up with, or rediscovers, inventions of his own. In the film, he interviews British artist David Hockney and architect Philip Steadman who believe optics help explain Vermeer’s genius, but warn Jenison the art historians and critics don’t want to hear it. Tim even persuades Buckingham Palace officials to let him see the original painting.

Fascinating character, process, and insights. You’ll go away appreciating the “fathomable genius” of Vermeer more than ever, guaranteed. Great links here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

In the Land of Blood and Honey

Angelina Jolie, movie, In the Land of Blood and Honey

Possibly you didn’t know Angelina Jolie has directed a movie, and, if so, probably you haven’t seen it. I heard about her 2011 film about the Bosnian war, In the Land of Blood and Honey (trailer), in Serbia last fall. Due to Serbian objections to the film, it was actually shot in Hungary, with actors from the former Yugoslavia (starring Zana Marjanović, Goran Kostić, and Rade Šerbedžija). Jolie, whose humanitarian work is well known, says she was motivated to write the script after twice visiting Bosnia and Herzegovina as a United Nations Goodwill Ambassador and because this conflict was the worst European genocide since World War II. An estimated 100,000 people were killed, and 20,000 to 50,000 women were raped.

It’s a love story between a Muslim woman and a Serbian military officer, with all the inter-ethnic and wartime complications you can readily imagine. But what’s interesting is that, for the most part, the story is told from the point of view of women and what they endure during wartime and how they survive.

The film received mixed reviews in the United States, Rotten Tomatoes rating: 56, with many critics seeming to take issues with Jolie’s humanitarian impulses themselves. However, Newsday’s critic Rafer Guzman said, “It’s a tough, clear-eyed look at a ghastly ethnic war, with an admirably wide perspective that affords compassion for both sides,” while Roger Ebert, who gave it a low ranking, acknowledged that “The film does what all war films must, which is to reduce the incomprehensible suffering of countless people into the ultimate triumph of a few.”

The film was highly controversial in Serbia, not surprisingly, and Jolie and some cast members received threats. Serbs claimed it was propagandistic and reduced Serbs to caricatures of evil. I didn’t see it entirely that way; there were sympathetic Serbs, including the main character. (And the Serbs did carry out “ethnic cleansing,” after all.) Interesting that it won an honorable mention in the Sarajevo Film Festival and a peace award at the Berlin film festival.

My bottom line is that the film is pretty good, even if it does use some tired tropes, but the ultimate question—what was the rest of the world doing while all this was going on?—is still worth asking. Critics might dismiss the film, but no one should forget the tragedy  behind it.