Kids Review Books

child reading, children's books

(photo: upload.wikimedia.org)

Fast-growing children’s reading and book discovery site BiblioNasium has launched a feature that lets kids under 13 review books (previously disallowed so kids didn’t inadvertently provide personally identifiable information). In part the impetus for the new service was evidence that kids read and respond to books recommended by their friends.

Says BiblioNasium Chief Education Advocate Adele Schwartz, “Our goal is to instill the habit of reading and to raise a generation of passionate readers.” The website, designed for children K-8, includes reading challenges, virtual rewards, online reading logs, and other features, as well as the reviews, “in a safe and private digital space.”

Currently, nearly 100,000 kids and 20,000 educators use the site and growing by about 1,000 users every week. When asked whether the future of reading and book recommendations is social, BiblioNasium founder Marjan Ghara said, “The present of reading is social.”

Among other awards, BiblioNasium is a recent winner of an EdTech Digest 2014 Cool Tools Award and a 2013 Best Website for Teaching & Learning award from the American Association of School Librarians.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Writing with Friends

Room at the Table, Writing, WritersFor some time I’ve felt the many rewards of having a close group of friends in our writing group, which after almost a decade we’ve finally given a name: Room at the Table. The irony is, there isn’t any more room at my dining table, where we meet, because we’ve gradually grown to about 13, though only 10 or 11 of us make each monthly meeting. The group is about equally divided between men and women, all of us “over 35,” many of us also participants in Lauren B. Davis’s estimable “Sharpening the Quill” writing workshops.

Some members say they come for the snacks, but they all come with carefully reviewed submissions by others, and we spend the next two hours discussing each others’ work. We provide enthusiasm, help people get unstuck, ask the occasional big question (Where Is This Going?) and generously share our ideas and grammatical obsessions. Occasionally, we do an exercise from John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction, and one such, which involved imagining the characters of a ghost story, created such enthusiasm among the three of us (at the time) that we all wrote the story, and were all published.

I’ve heard of critique groups that like to eviscerate the author. That isn’t us. This week we tried something new. Five of us did a reading of our fiction at the local library and, unbelievably, 35 people came. They applauded the stories they heard, which were quite good. They had snacks, another area of expertise. They stayed to chat. Big success. Very proud.

We Need a Word for That!

owl, wordbirds, Liesl SchillingerCharming description of Liesl Schillinger’s book Wordbirds: An Irreverent Lexicon for the 21st Century in the New York Times this week, illustrated by Elizabeth Zechel. When confronted by some mind-freezing dilemma, did you ever say, “there oughtta be a word for that?” Well, maybe there is, in her collection of 200. Her tumblr blog is updated weekly, too.Some of her favorites are collected in the book.

Here are a couple of gems with Schillinger’s definitions:

  • Icyclist: a person who bikes in the dead of winter
  • Occuplaytion: the fanciful jobs invented for heroines of Hollywood romantic comedies
  • Nagivator: a person constantly giving directions to the car’s driver
  • Cancellelation: the joy you feel when you cancel something you didn’t want to do in the first place

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Oscar Winner: The Great Beauty

The Great Beauty, Toni Servillo, Paolo SorrentinoWanted to see The Great Beauty (trailer), the Paolo Sorrentino’s movie that won this year’s Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. And could have won for cinematography—in it, Rome is The Great Beauty. Nice score, too. Toni Servillo makes the essentially selfish main character actually charming.

It’s the story of Jep Gambardella, who won fame with one novelette many years before and survives as merely a social creature, someone who knows everyone and whom everyone knows. The send-ups of performance art—and artists—are genuinely funny. But most of the film is linked together only by being in some way over-the-top, with the only authentic exchanges ones Jep has with his maid. You keep waiting for Jep to wake up, because scenes’ link to reality seems so tenuous. The botox clinic, the man with the keys, the giraffe.

The disconnected scenes—from the profane to the sublime—just didn’t add up to much for me. Roger Ebert liked it better than I did. Rotten Tomatoes rating: critics (91%); audience (79%).

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The Grand Budapest Hotel

Edward Norton, Ralph Fiennes, Tony Revolori, The Grand Budapest Hotel

The Grand Budapest Hotel (trailer and other stuff here)—sold out in the local movie house playing it on two screeens—is an enjoyable romp through the Central European country of Zubrowka, obscure even by fictional standards in the early 1930’s, as an unnamed brutal regime is taking increasing power. It’s best not to fixate on Wes Anderson’s tissue-paper plot and instead enjoy the numerous cameo roles. I have to believe that working on Anderson’s movies is fun; otherwise so many notable actors wouldn’t agree to do it!

Anderson didn’t break the budget on a lot of CGI to achieve verisimilitude—the imaginary vistas fit right into this fable about a generous spirit with impeccable standards. It’s great to see Ralph Fiennes, one of my faves, in an upbeat role for a change as the hotel’s concierge, Gustave H.  The fascist peril is real, nonetheless, and marks the certain end of the world the concierge is trying to desperately to protect.

If you need a break from late winter’s interminable gloom, this movie is a lively breath of spring. Rotten Tomatoes rating: critics and audiences agree (for once): 91%. Says critic Rene Rodriguez, “the pleasure curls your toes.”

The movie is based on the several writings by Austrian novelist, biographer, and playwright Stefan Zweig, a Jew who in real life fled his country upon the rise of Hitler—first to London, then New York, and Brazil.Enhanced by Zemanta

Enough Said

James Gandolfini, Julia Louis Dreyfus, Enough SaidSuch a shame James Gandolfini’s near-last movie had to be the lifeless Enough Said (trailer). The acting is fine, but the dialog is awful. And at the crisis moment, when he asks the heroine why she did what she did, the writer drew a blank, leaving poor Julia Louis Dreyfus to just shrug. So much for motivation. As reviewer Nathan Rabin said, “Enough Said is afflicted with a terminal case of what Roger Ebert dubbed ‘The Idiot Plot,’ in which a single reasonable sentence uttered in a rational tone could easily, diplomatically resolve the film’s core conflict.” Actually painful to watch.

As is so often the case with Hollywood, what these two see in each other is another blank—they laugh a lot, or she does—and she has to be a pretty dumb cluck not to question some of the received opinions about him. Her friends—Toni Collette and Ben Falcone—are a mysterious couple, who stay together because . . . actually, I can’t figure out why. Collette, it turns out, is a therapist, but displays no insight into her friend’s relationship or why she herself keeps rearranging her furniture. Same house, same furniture, same husband.

Rotten Tomatoes rating: an unbelievable 96, which I have to believe reflected the reviewers’ respect for Gandolfini in roles other than this one. Among audience members—generally more forgiving—only 78 percent liked it.

P.S. Maybe in Hollywood, they still call a woman “masseuse,” but everywhere else it’s “massage therapist.”

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Heartlands

Michael Sheen, Heartlands, movieThe British movie Heartlands (2002) (trailer) and I got off on the wrong foot when I glimpsed the opening credits and saw —–Sheen in the cast, and I waited apprehensively for Charlie Sheen to show up. Finally, I recognized a young Michael Sheen. Then the accents made sense, too. Sheen plays a terminally mild-mannered young man whose only discernible talent is playing darts. He throws them throughout the opening credits and, after I started noticing, he didn’t blink once.

In the film, he’s aced out of both a big darts tournament and his wife by none other than Jim Carter (Downton Abbey’s redoubtable Carson—fun to see him in his younger days). Our hero takes his mo-ped on the road to get to Blackpool (“the Las Vegas of the North”) and win her back. Road movies always turn into picaresques, and he meets some terrific characters on the way.

Not a must-see, but sweet. Sheen is always terrific. Rotten Tomatoes rating: 60 percent, but 81 percent of the audience liked it! Me, too. Low stress. (And not to be confused with other movies of similar names!)

29 Ways to Boost Your Creativity

coffee, creativity

(photo: farm3.staticflickr.com)

My blog readers liked the infographic on becoming more productive. Well, before you get all Type A on us, kick back and enjoy this short video on increasing creativity. No problem for me with #8 – COFFEE!  And #11 is easy, too: Surround yourself with creative people.  That’s why you’re reading this, right? You’re one of them for me. This is a great reminder to nurture your creative spirit, wherever it appears—in art, writing, photography, social change—whatever!  You CAN do it.

The key to creativity, I think, is not to try to do all 29 at once—that’s a recipe for disappointment. Watch the video and do one or two. Get some good habits going. Then in a month or two, watch again, and do one or two more. It will get easier. Me? I plan to start by straightening up my office, the floor of which is only rumored to exist.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Comma Sense

red pencil, grammar, comma“Perhaps the most hotly contested punctuation mark of all time”—the Oxford comma is back in the news. Well, sort of. See this 3-minute TED-Ed lesson animation, and see what you think. Plus a quiz to test your comma-sense and the chance to participate in discussions of this burning controversy, including one entitled “Why do you think so many people care so much about grammar?” Hadn’t notice that, really, in everyday life. Maybe it’s generational. Like the MDs who want first-year residents to suffer through 40-hour shifts in the emergency department, because, “goddammit, I did it and survived,” though possibly their patients didn’t. Those of us who absorbed all the rules hammered into our brains in junior high, goddammit, feel the same way about our hard-won expertise: “Can you believe he split an infinitive?” (that’s ok now, BTW). But not, as I read the other day: “He sent the email to him and I.” Ouch.

I use the serial comma, myself, because most of the time it avoids confusion. But I confess that using commas in all the technically correct places can make you want to brush at the page as if there were crumbs on it. At the moment I’m reading a Cormac McCarthy novel that is heavily “and”-dependent and nary a comma on the dust-clogged horizon. Makes for an interesting tone.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Girls Books, Boys Books?

girls books, boys boooks, Let Books Be Books, gender stereotyping
(photo: farm5.staticflickr.com)

Is “The Very Hungry Caterpillar” a girls’ book or a boys’ book? Is “Chicka-Chicka-Boom-Boom”? These are books for any child. But as children grow past the board-book stage, it doesn’t take long for gender stereotyping to creep in, with princesses and cupcakes for girls and superheroes (OK, a few not-so-interesting super-heroines, too) and robots for boys. Last I knew, boys liked cupcakes, too. Too bad the ones in books are always pink.

The UK grassroots (moms and dads) gender-neutral toy campaign, Let Toys Be Toys, has launched a “Let Books Be Books” effort to encourage publishers, booksellers, (and bookbuyers) to be reexamine their marketing practices and better reflect the diversity of kids interests, rather than channeling them into girl-boy stereotypes. It’s gaining support. I loved Nancy Drew until I read my first Hardy Boys adventure, and I never looked back. The “boys books” were just more fun!

The covers of the books on the Let Books Be Books web page tell the story. The boys’ covers feature adventure! Skills! (Submarines, kites, soccer, vikings, rocket ships); the girls’ books? Cupcakes, butterflies, flowers, balloons, jewelry. You’re nothing if not slathered in cutesy stuff. The message is clear: Boys DO. Girls look pretty. In 2014? (You can sign a petition here, if you care to).

“Artificial boundaries turn children away from their true preferences,” the LBBB website says. They narrow kids’ perspective on the world. A recent birthday party for a four-year-old girl provided cloying evidence that “Princesses Rule” in the constricted world of gifts for diminutive females. This tiny effort may be a dragonfly wing in the hurricane of gender-based marketing, but still worth taking a stand.